<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Reviews: The Deer Hunter (1978)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.titsandgore.com/2008/03/10/mike-reviews-the-deer-hunter-1978/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.titsandgore.com/2008/03/10/mike-reviews-the-deer-hunter-1978/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:04:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.titsandgore.com/2008/03/10/mike-reviews-the-deer-hunter-1978/comment-page-1/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.titsandgore.com/2008/03/10/mike-reviews-the-deer-hunter-1978/#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>How quickly we forget Shooter.  Good point about apathy, though.
In part questioning patriotism is now so inbuilt into the Hollywood system that the questioning is empty.  It&#039;s a posture meted out by war films (or maybe more appropriately skirmish films) that straddle the action genre or spy genres and so become reduced in continual hyperbole.  I think the skirmish film in particular probably skews more people&#039;s perceptions of what the CIA is and what it does than the actual CIA does.  It&#039;s fertile fiction since ostensible no one knows about the superhuman acts of the secret police.  The only solid post Vietnam era war fiction film I can think of is Three Kings (can&#039;t really count The Big Lebowski, even though the aggression will not stand, man)-- Welcome to Sarajevo wasn&#039;t bad.  Part of the problem might just be locating the war- war seems to have skipped its original borders.  Maybe if we include the war on drugs or the inner city gang wars we might get a few more films in there (Boys n the Hood, Menace II Society, Dark Blue- that list can go on forever).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How quickly we forget Shooter.  Good point about apathy, though.<br />
In part questioning patriotism is now so inbuilt into the Hollywood system that the questioning is empty.  It&#8217;s a posture meted out by war films (or maybe more appropriately skirmish films) that straddle the action genre or spy genres and so become reduced in continual hyperbole.  I think the skirmish film in particular probably skews more people&#8217;s perceptions of what the CIA is and what it does than the actual CIA does.  It&#8217;s fertile fiction since ostensible no one knows about the superhuman acts of the secret police.  The only solid post Vietnam era war fiction film I can think of is Three Kings (can&#8217;t really count The Big Lebowski, even though the aggression will not stand, man)&#8211; Welcome to Sarajevo wasn&#8217;t bad.  Part of the problem might just be locating the war- war seems to have skipped its original borders.  Maybe if we include the war on drugs or the inner city gang wars we might get a few more films in there (Boys n the Hood, Menace II Society, Dark Blue- that list can go on forever).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

